Talk:Flash II: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is gonna be a tough one cubs but Veteranrio explained it to me like this... Flash/Flash I are the same guy... he was the original and wrestled in the 70's, 80's and 90's. When his sons made their debut, they were called El Hijo De Flash I(the guy we know as Flash I) and El Hijo De Flash II(the guy we know as Flash II). Then came the problem as when Flash officially retired, his sons were just called Flash I and Flash II without the "El Hijo De" attached. I never knew that... it seems very few people do know that b/c it's become as common as calling Rencor Latino like that instead of Rencor Latino Jr. which he really is. So we probably should do some re-naming of bios here, yes? Or leave it as is? I'm in favor of fixing it to be accurate.--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 23:27, 29 June 2006 (CDT) | This is gonna be a tough one cubs but Veteranrio explained it to me like this... Flash/Flash I are the same guy... he was the original and wrestled in the 70's, 80's and 90's. When his sons made their debut, they were called El Hijo De Flash I(the guy we know as Flash I) and El Hijo De Flash II(the guy we know as Flash II). Then came the problem as when Flash officially retired, his sons were just called Flash I and Flash II without the "El Hijo De" attached. I never knew that... it seems very few people do know that b/c it's become as common as calling Rencor Latino like that instead of Rencor Latino Jr. which he really is. So we probably should do some re-naming of bios here, yes? Or leave it as is? I'm in favor of fixing it to be accurate.--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 23:27, 29 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
My new idea is to leave the father as 'Flash (original)' and keep the kids as 'Flash I' & 'Flash II'.--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 03:49, 1 July 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:49, 1 July 2006
This is gonna be a tough one cubs but Veteranrio explained it to me like this... Flash/Flash I are the same guy... he was the original and wrestled in the 70's, 80's and 90's. When his sons made their debut, they were called El Hijo De Flash I(the guy we know as Flash I) and El Hijo De Flash II(the guy we know as Flash II). Then came the problem as when Flash officially retired, his sons were just called Flash I and Flash II without the "El Hijo De" attached. I never knew that... it seems very few people do know that b/c it's become as common as calling Rencor Latino like that instead of Rencor Latino Jr. which he really is. So we probably should do some re-naming of bios here, yes? Or leave it as is? I'm in favor of fixing it to be accurate.--Robert 23:27, 29 June 2006 (CDT)
My new idea is to leave the father as 'Flash (original)' and keep the kids as 'Flash I' & 'Flash II'.--Robert 03:49, 1 July 2006 (CDT)
