Talk:El Sanguinario: Difference between revisions
From Luchawiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Nick-Patrick (talk | contribs) (New page: Some fans speculated that the current La Parka AAA may have impersonated La Calaca on the first match of this gimmick and then let the outfit to Medina. Can this fact be true?) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some fans speculated that the current La Parka AAA may have impersonated La Calaca on the first match of this gimmick and then let the outfit to Medina. Can this fact be true? | Some fans speculated that the current La Parka AAA may have impersonated La Calaca on the first match of this gimmick and then let the outfit to Medina. Can this fact be true? | ||
Can it be true? Perhaps. But fans speculation cannot be considered fact. I've seen certain Box y Lucha members that swear there have been three Misticos. None of them can prove it though. Anyone can spectulate something but they gotta provide SOME facts to back it up. If we leave what you edited in - someone will read it, tell their friend and before you know it - it'll be considered fact which is wrong.--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 20:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 25 April 2009
Some fans speculated that the current La Parka AAA may have impersonated La Calaca on the first match of this gimmick and then let the outfit to Medina. Can this fact be true?
Can it be true? Perhaps. But fans speculation cannot be considered fact. I've seen certain Box y Lucha members that swear there have been three Misticos. None of them can prove it though. Anyone can spectulate something but they gotta provide SOME facts to back it up. If we leave what you edited in - someone will read it, tell their friend and before you know it - it'll be considered fact which is wrong.--Robert 20:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
